Part 19: Australia’s “irrelevant” Crimes against Humanity. Another email to the Queensland Justice Minister, Yvette D`Arth re the wisdom of a High Court Challenge to the Baden-Clay decision.

Below is the text of another email to Yvette D`Arth, the Queensland Justice Minister, in which I emphasize the risks involved if Gerard Baden-Clay takes on-board the evidence relating to the civil rights violations that have seen millions of welfare recipients ripped off and the possibility  of a huge death toll caused by these violations of rights. References to ‘The Emcott Report’ refer to the document below which contains over 80 case studies that could aid anyone accused of crime, including murder, to mount an Apprehended Bias defence in a court of law.

[Note the short link URL for this posting is:  http://wp.me/p1n8TZ-t4    ]

This is a 328 page report that is still being edited. it identifies politicians, public servants and police officers involved in hiding the death toll caused by both Breaching and Centrelink's "Waivergate" rip-off. It also looks at other deaths caused by lousy decision making by politicians, bureaucrats and police.

This is a 328 page report that is still being edited. It identifies politicians, public servants and police officers involved in hiding the death toll caused by both Breaching and the “Waivergate” rip-off.

 

 

Federal Agent Pearce’s email below is beyond farcical; it explains why federal politicians rort the Parliamentary Entitlements Fund with impunity, i.e. they have immunity from prosecution because of the “government protocols” which violate s 149 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code Act. This email provides insight into the Bronwyn Bishop “Chopper-gate” incident last year when she blew $5,200 of taxpayers money to hire a helicopter to fly from Melbourne to Geelong. It also explains why Tony Abbott reportedly spent $9,400 of taxpayers money to fly 1st class to his own book launch!

Unreal, totally unreal; both the rorting and the refusal of the AFP to investigate rorting by MPs whilst working with the DHS to investigate and prosecute welfare recipients.

After the Auditor-Generalworked out that 144 federal MPs had ripped off the "Entitlements Fund" to the tune of $4.64 MILLION, the Federal Police again refused to investigate citing almost the same legally invalid reasons as in 2004.

After the Auditor-General worked out that 144 federal MPs had ripped off the “Entitlements Fund” to the tune of $4.64 MILLION, the Federal Police again refused to investigate citing almost the same legally invalid reasons as in 2004.

HOWEVER,

The’ fly-in-the-ointment’ for you is the reference to the 2004 decision by the Federal Police not to investigate my complaints against the Howard Government. The illegal enforcement of breaching quotas resulted in a large number of fatalities that under Article 7 (1) (a) of the Rome Statute, and states laws in Australia, are murders. This refusal to investigate was subsequently classified by the Leg-Con Committee in November 2005, a copy of page 1 of which was provided to you in my previous email.

I request that this email be made available to the DPP and to Gerard Baden-Clay and his legal representative and would again point out that the withholding of this information would constitute a serious procedural fairness violation. In view of the fact that a significant proportion of the unreported, classified, “irrelevant” death toll occurred in Queensland, you/and or your staff, may face Obstruction of Justice charges if this information is not made available to Gerard Baden-Clay.

Whatever the actual death toll, the High Court will need to know about it before it can rule on any Apprehended Bias argument that representatives of Mr. Baden-Clay may raise on his behalf and for this reason, you need to know how many welfare recipients are dead as a result of either Breaching or the DHS’s “Waivergate” rip-off.

Please note that “The Emcott Report” is a work-in-progress that is being made available to welfare recipients and others who may use it to their legal advantage. There are many typos, et cetera but the case studies issues and documents are valid and potentially a huge problem for you and so I recommend that you evaluate this document very carefully,

More unpleasant FUBAR info will be forwarded in the next few days.

Yours truly,

Ronald Medlicott

========================================================

Anyone accused of a crime can use this email and Federal Agent Denley’s letter to argue a “Why pick on me” Apprehended Bias case for the charges against them to be set aside on the grounds of bias. When I say “anyone’ I mean just that. The constitution does not pick and choose; it states in paragraph 5 that “the laws of the Commonwealth shall be binding on the Courts, judges, and the people,” When the Federal Police pick on one person who may have killed someone but ingore other deaths, that is massive ostensible bias, a procedural fairness violation that opens the door to criminal charges or convictions being ‘set-aside’, i.e. tossed out of court.

The AFP was working in partnership WITH Centrelink to catch welfare fraudsters but refused to investigate fraud BY Centrelink . I believe that's what is known as nemo iudex in causa sua, i.e. protecting your own patch.

The AFP was working in partnership WITH Centrelink to catch welfare fraudsters but refused to investigate fraud BY Centrelink . I believe that’s what is known as nemo iudex in causa sua, i.e. protecting your own patch.

Federal Agent Denley’s letter only pours fuel on the fire by revealing the time frame during which the Federal Police ignored the Crimes against Humanity committed by the Federal Parliament through Breaching laws and unlawful abuses of power such as the unconstitutional “Account payable” letters that Centrelink sends out by the thousands in an effort to recover $5 BILLION in over-payments, most of which may have been due to errors by Centrelink as per the letter below.

CarolynMy message to welfare recipients is very simple;

  1. Keep good records when dealing with Centrelink,
  2. Expect flagrant, potentially lethal violations of your rights which the Federal Police will ignore until the day their actions are questioned by a court, preferably the High Court,
  3. Be prepared to fight for your rights on occasions and expect dirty tricks from those bureaucrats who believe that welfare recipients are “fair game” and don’t care if they wind up as “dead meat.”

Just like Apartheid in South Africa, Breaching laws in Australia are a Crime against Humanity and therefore the following quote made in July 2009 by Francis Neale, co-chair of the International Bar Association’s Rule of Law Action Group is worth  keeping in mind:

 “All countries, even those governed by the crudest dictatorship, need or have laws, although they disregard the individual or collective rights of all or parts of the population. Indeed, apartheid was enforced with meticulous attention to form and detail.”

 The use of unjust, human rights violating laws, policies and practices to justify fraud and murder in the name of ideologically driven beliefs should not be acceptable in any democratic country, especially in our country, Australia! Excuses such as “I was only doing my job”, or “I was only following orders” were not acceptable excuses at the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials. Similarly, when it comes to breaching triggered fatalities, the excuse “I was only upholding the law” is totally unacceptable.

Ronald Medlicott – A Christian lay advocate for Justice in Australia.

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s