-
Join 116 other subscribers
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- September 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
Categories
- 2016 Federal Election
- abuse of power
- burden of proof
- burking
- Case law
- civil rights
- covid 19
- crimes against humanity
- election
- European Parliament
- genocide
- Human Rights violations
- international criminal court
- international law
- murder
- News and politics
- Political
- right to life
- Uncategorized
- Welfare rights
- White Collar Crime
Meta
Blog Stats
- 60,523 hits
Tag Archives: paragraph 5 constitution
Part 45: Australia’s “irrelevant” Crimes against humanity. High Court case 15/2017: Barnaby Joyce.
Below is the text of an emailed public submission to the High Court “In the matter of questions referred to the Court of Disputed Returns pursuant to section 376 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) concerning The Hon. Barnaby … Continue reading →
Posted in abuse of power, Case law, Human Rights violations, News and politics, Political, Uncategorized, Welfare rights, White Collar Crime
|
Tagged /2017, barnaby joyce, case 15, cconnelly v dpp at p 1301, connelly v p.p.p, constitution, constitution binding on courts, emngineers case, functus officio, haca 15/2017, justice higgins, paragraph 5 constitution, rob day, rod culleton, void ab initio, williams v spautz
|
1 Comment
Ronald's space 