-
Join 116 other subscribers
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- September 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
Categories
- 2016 Federal Election
- abuse of power
- burden of proof
- burking
- Case law
- civil rights
- covid 19
- crimes against humanity
- election
- European Parliament
- genocide
- Human Rights violations
- international criminal court
- international law
- murder
- News and politics
- Political
- right to life
- Uncategorized
- Welfare rights
- White Collar Crime
Meta
Blog Stats
- 60,539 hits
Monthly Archives: March 2017
Part 42G. Australia’s “irrelevant” Crimes against Humanity. AAT 2016.5334 and the issue of Unreliable Evidence.
Australia’s “irrelevant” Crimes against Humanity. AAT 2016.5334 and the Centrelink non-disclosure issue of Systemic Unreliable Evidence. The short link URL: for this page is: http://wp.me/p1n8TZ-WH UNRELIABLE EVIDENCE: Police v Butcher [2016] The following text comes from Volume 3 of The … Continue reading
Part 42E. Australia’s “irrelevant” Crimes against Humanity. AAT 2016/5334 may be a legal precedent that could cripple the national budget and bankrupt federal politicians.
Australia’s “irrelevant” Crimes against Humanity have hit a major legal snag. One potential consequence of the AAT 2016/5334 “Nole contendere” decision in favour of the welfare recipient that I represented was that this decision is potentially a legal precedent that … Continue reading
Posted in crimes against humanity, Human Rights violations, News and politics, Political, Uncategorized, Welfare rights
Tagged 2d2f, aat 2016/5334, abuse of power, alan tudge, an admission of fault, bhardwaj, breaching, burden of proof, christian porter, civil rights violation, compensation, crimes against humanity, criminal defamation, duces tecum, ewre committee, garbage in garbage out, genocide, gigi, hellicar, malcolm turnbull, michael schwartzback no contest, mind-of-the-matter, mindset of murder, murder, nole contendere, noloe contendere, police v butcher, reckless indifference, the burden of proof, tudge fudge fraud, winifred brennan v james hardie
2 Comments
Part 42d. Australia’s “irrelevant” Crimes against Humanity. Understanding how to use the AAT 2016/5334 appeal to fight Centrelink’s fraudulent claims.
AAT appeal decision 2016/5334 is a landmark decision but to use it to fight Centrelink’s fraudulent claims, you need to understand what is so important about this decision. Point #1: Most of Centrelink’s legal actions, [known as TORT ACTIONS or … Continue reading
Posted in crimes against humanity, Human Rights violations, News and politics, Political, Uncategorized, Welfare rights
Tagged 44% error, 44% error rate, aat 2016/5334, abuse of power s 142.2, alan tudge, bhardwaj, coco v r, fishing expedition, fraud, hellicar, lacks integrity, malcolm turnbull, murder, nolle contendere, senator brandis, tanya slibersek, tudge fudge fraud, unreliable evidence
Leave a comment
Part 42 C. AAT 2016/5334 may be the legal precedent that finally ends 40 years of persecution, intimidation, fraud and murder, e.g it may be able to shut down Malcolm Turnbull’s infamous Tudge Fudge Fraud.
AAT2016/5334 could be the means to finally end decades of persecution of welfare recipients. The question is, will victims of the Australian Parliament’s criminal misconduct take advantage of this golden opportunity to finally receive justice? Continue reading
Posted in crimes against humanity, Human Rights violations, News and politics, Political, Uncategorized, Welfare rights
Tagged 268.3 Crimes against humanity, aat, aat2016/5334, abc, abc q and a, abuse of power, afp, bhardwaj decision, ewre, facts of the matter, gemocide, hellicar deision, irrefutable evidence, isis computer suystem, legcon, malcolm turnbull, menace, murder, police v butcher, q and a, section 138, section 142. (2), section 149.1, senator brandis, tanya slibersek, tudge, tudge fudge fraud, turnbull, unreliable evidence
Leave a comment
Part 42B: Australia’s “irrelevant” Crimes against Humanity. The Hellicar “H-Bomb” nuked Malcolm Turnbull’s Tudge Fudge Fraud.
The Hellicar “H-Bomb” nuked Malcolm Turnbull’s Tudge Fudge Fraud. The short URl for this posting is: http://wp.me/p1n8TZ-Sf Cop this lot: On 21st February 2017, as the Representative of a welfare recipient, I submitted a statement of facts to the Administrative … Continue reading